Posted on Leave a comment

Why ‘Change-Ready’ Brains Do Not Need ‘Normal’

Why 'Change-Ready' Brains Do Not Need You To 'Keep Things Normal'

It is not strongest of the species that survive, but the most adaptable”. 

The source of this quote is debatable but it’s true, regardless. 

Most of us like to think we’re adaptable, but what does it really mean to have a ‘change-ready brain‘? 🧠

We’d probably cut children – and ourselves, actually – a bit more slack if we knew how difficult a brain finds change, even when it’s desired.
Young and immature brains in particular are not equipped for unexpected or distressing change;

💔 Bereavement and loss

🏠 Sudden house or school moves

 ⛓️‍💥 Unexpected living arrangements or placement break-downs

💉 The impacts of injury or illness

👩‍👩‍👧‍👧 Parental separation

These kinds of changes can destabilise any adult, not just young people, but when these changes affect us, as the supporting adult as well, we need to be able to manage those changes, before we can expect children to.

And yet often, our knee-jerk response is to ‘keep things normal‘. It usually comes from a well-intended place, and it can have value, of course.
But not always.
Not when ‘keeping things normal’ denies kids – and maybe ourselves – the opportunity to process, adjust and adapt to whatever change we and/or they are trying to process, e.g.

🫢 We suppress our own stress responses, and pretend ‘it’s fine‘ when it’s not.

👀 We miss kids’ cues, and the subsequent opportunity to help them in the ways they need.

🏋 We inadvertently put them under pressure to ‘be normal’ when they couldn’t feel less normal if they tried.

It’s safe to acknowledge that life is ‘not normal’; it doesn’t mean that the child, or we as the supportive adult, are ‘not coping’ or that one or both of us falling apart is inevitable.

Accepting and learning to live with the messiness of life, for as long as that may last, can be deeply uncomfortable.
Releasing the need to try and control everything – including how children feel about and how they respond to that discomfort – can be excruciating. 

But, if we are to give children – and ourselves – the breathing space they need to adapt,  these things are are also necessary. 
So lean into the messiness and the uncertainty, to the questions you cannot answer and the future you can’t yet see.

And relieve the children you live or work – and perhaps yourself – of the burden of ‘normal’.🎈

Gems like this land directly in your inbox when you’re subscribed; sign up below!

Posted on Leave a comment

‘I Have To Be Strong For My Kids’! Or Do You?…

'Being Strong' For Your Kids?... Re-Thinking 'Support' When Own Load Is Heavy

We don’t acknowledge anywhere near enough how difficult it is, as the ‘grown-up’, to support our children emotionally, when we’re already under enormous emotional strain ourselves.

And we should, because most of us know from experience that pretending everything’s ok, ‘pushing on‘, or ‘trying to be strong’ has a pretty short shelf-life.

We all have those days when the ‘to-do’ list is too long, we’re stretching ourselves too thin, and the end of the day can’t come soon enough.

But sometimes, it’s much more than a difficult day or multi-multi-tasking. Sometimes, we can’t always rely on tomorrow to diminish stress or worry; the same relentless uphill struggle will be there to greet us when we wake up.

And whether those struggles are parenting-related or not, our children feel them. 
This isn’t about evoking guilt or sitting in judgement; quite the opposite, in fact. Because, IMO, the expectation that if, as parents in particular, we can’t make everything ok, we should at least behave like it is, is wildly unrealistic.

‘Shame…’ 
I was talking with a parent support service recently about how this feeling has crept into parenting in recent years.
Because, when things go wrong for our children – and a lot clearly is going wrong for this generation – how often is the typical response ‘blame the parents‘?
Almost always…

Very rarely are parents commended, congratulated, applauded or celebrated, and yet the judgement about how we raise our kids is relentless; if they’re not beautifully behaved, engaged, well-balanced, socially and emotionally mature, it’s usually parents’ fault.

Of course, there are a minority of parents that could and should do better by their children. 
But very often, mums and dads are just doing their best under really challenging circumstances.

And this is where I get a bit triggered by ‘Be strong’; ‘I’m trying to be strong’ or ‘you’re stronger than you think’ etc.
I believe in ‘strength’ of course, but much more so I believe in ‘resilience’ and they’re not always the same thing.

Resilience doesn’t always demand that we doggedly push on. Sometimes resilience is the ability to bend, or soften, or even to let go.
Even if just temporarily, the kindest possible act – for ourselves, and for our children – is to stop trying to carry everything on our own, all the time.

That is not what strength looks like. 
That is what exhaustion, overwhelm and burnout look like. 

I’m not suggesting we stop trying to protect our kids, or that we burden them with adult worries and responsibilities.
I am suggesting that it’s healthy for them to know that life sometimes puts obstacles in the way, and they won’t always handle it well or know what to do…

Only when our kids recognise that this is true, even for grown-ups -and by modelling how to give ourselves grace – can we expect our children to treat themselves with self-compassion. 

As a parent, ask yourself this question: Do you want your children to grow up with the same levels of overload and weight as you often bear in your own life?
Most of us don’t, and yet leading with self-compassion can go against all of our better instincts, which prefers the ‘crack on‘ mentality.

When ‘crack on’ is our default position, we paradoxically find comfort in its familiarity.
But the truth is it’s not honest or helpful – today, or ever – to give our children the impression that to struggle – with overwhelm, heartache, procrastination, defeat – or any other challenge is synonymous with a lack of ‘strength’.

As the saying goes ‘The species that survives is not the fittest, it is the most adaptable’.  

That means that, instead of teaching our kids to sit in self-judgement, we show them how to recognise that the sense of struggle, overwhelm etc. are signals; not of ‘weakness’ but of the need to adapt… To pause, to change direction, to release, to rest or reset.
This is what ‘strength’  looks like.

Insights like this land directly in your inbox when you’re on my mailing list. Sign up below!

Posted on Leave a comment

Reducing Emotional Discomfort… There Are Other (And Better!) Choices…

Why Empathy Doesn't Come Naturally... (and why it's much harder than we think)

 I’m not a born mathematician, but trying to help my 12 year old with his homework has made me SO pleased that I don’t have to do secondary school in 2026; I’m staggered by the complexity of what he’s expected to understand.

Today’s musings aren’t about homework though. 
They’re about how we handle it when our children have a problem, and what we can miss when we give in to the fierce urge to solve it for them.

Even with a relatively
 shallow subject like school work, this is how it’s been playing out in my house… 

It’s all done online, so the only way to complete it is to get every answer right.
So when my child can’t, like most kids, he naturally asks me to summon up the answer. 
His expectation becomes my expectation: Fix it, fix, it, fix it…

This is familiar territory for most parents, and the source of our children’s struggles is often much deeper than homework frustrations; feeling excluded, humiliated, defeated, guilty, angry, sad, ashamed; the list goes on. 

So problem-solving mode kicks in.
We feel like we’re connected with those feelings because we’re helping them;

“We can fix it”
“There’s no need to cry”
“It’s going to be ok”
“It will all blow over”
“There’s nothing to worry about”

And the age-old chestnut, “Calm down” (Since when, in the history of humankind, has ‘calm down’ helped anyone to calm down?) 

But, while there’s a time and place for these responses, when stuck in big feelings or distress, rarely are they what any of us – child or adult – need in the moment. 

Whatever version of ‘making things better’ we offer, if we’re more connected to our need to take their discomfort away than their experience, that’s not empathy.

As emotions researcher Brene Brown states “Empathy is vulnerable choice, because in order to connect with you, I have to connect with something in myself that knows that feeling”. 

In other words, being empathic means being able to sit with our own discomfort.

That may bring our own stuff to the surface, e.g. your child struggling to make friends in a new school may be painful for you too, if it means recalling being that kid yourself.

Maybe we end up triggered; it can be hard not to, when our children stress over the kinds of problems most people in the world can only dream of.

And often
, it’s reliable parent guilt that steers us away from empathic connection and back to the familiarity of  ‘Just make this feeling stop – for me, and them’.

In three minutes, this video by Brene Brown explains the power of empathy more beautifully than I can in this post.

But whether you watch it or not, here’s an invitation…

Next time your child presents you with an emotional discomfort, even when they’re in ‘fix it’ mode, pause

Recognise, but resist, the urge to solve it. Not necessarily forever, but ask yourself what your child really needs from you in that moment.

Because here’s what happened when I got over my need to just get the homework in. 

I saw a kid who needed me to acknowledge that not being able to skip that question or ask his teacher for help was unfair.
That he was right to be frustrated that his time was being hijacked by a pointless algebra question. 

Him knowing that I saw and heard him, I believed him and I ‘got it’, did far more powerful work than had I just got the calculator out in ‘reliable mum’ fashion.  

Choose empathy, even when it’s difficult. Because empathy makes ‘I see you, I hear you, I believe you, I get it’ enough.

Want insights like this to land directly inbox? Sign up below. 

Posted on Leave a comment

Paying Attention To How We Pay Attention… What Are We NOT Paying Attention To?

Paying Attention To How We Pay Attention… What Are We NOT Paying Attention To?

Q: “What was your ‘glow moment’ of the session?” ‌

A: “That we can be so focused on looking for one thing – so zoomed in on that detail – that we can miss so many other things.” ‌

This is an affirmative piece of learning from one of a group of educators who I was training about ‘The Art of Observation‘ last week.
Over the next two years, they’ll be using their observation skills to support our evaluation of a programme that’s being delivered across 12 schools and settings.

Many of the children participating have complex needs and disabilities, and limited vocabulary, so simply asking them to give verbal feedback isn’t a realistic option. Hence, ‘the art of observation‘ is an important part of the evaluation process.

Although none of us can never truly understand another’s experience – especially when a participant’s perception of the world may be very different from ours – it doesn’t mean that they can’t tell us anything meaningful and reliable.

It’s just that the ‘evidence’ of impact and outcomes look different than what we might otherwise expect.
Often, it’s only available in transient and fleeting cues; subtle changes in behaviours, barely-there clues in interactions; the quality of a child’s focus, the sensations they’re seeking, unexpected silences etc.

Finding ways to decipher those changes and decode the meaning in them is a growing part of my practice but, regardless of the type of setting you may work in, or the needs of the participants you work with, this can be more challenging and complex than at face value.

One reason why is because we usually know what kind of changes we want; improved engagement, increased motivation, sustained attention to the task.
Afterall, how well a young person (or adult) achieves those aims is rarely just an indicator of their success, but ours as well.
So inevitably, that influences they way we look; we pay attention to the desired changes.

And therein lies the issue…
When ‘results’, ‘outcomes’ or ‘success’ are pre-determined, we take notice and observe in particular ways because we’re essentially looking for ‘proof’.

Of course, we all need to know that we or a participant are achieving the aims; ‘results’ are usually the benchmark of us doing our job effectively.
But we can also learn remarkable things when we widen our field of vision.

Watch this video, following the instructions, and trying not to be influenced by the subject of this post…
It taught my trainees more powerfully in two and a half minutes than I could have myself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bnnmWYI0lM

A QUESTION… When we know what we’re looking for, what are we missing? ‌
When we’re paying attention to paying attention, what are we not paying attention to? ‌

How often are we NOT looking at the most useful or interesting or important thing, because we’re looking for something else; confirmation that we are right, or evidence that we’re on track etc? ‌

A TRUTH: It doesn’t matter how attuned an observer we are, we can’t see EVERYTHING at the same time.
Some things will always remain unnoticed and unevidenced. ‌
We need to accept that with the knowledge that we are sometimes blind to what’s right in front of us. ‌

So what might we need to stop looking at or looking for, so we can actually SEE what’s happening in front of us? 👀

Click here for more info on our research and evaluation work, or ask us a question.

Posted on Leave a comment

“The Unspoken Voice” And The Art Of Attunement

"The Unspoken Voice" And The Art Of Attunement

🗣️ Reggio Emilia talks about the ‘100 languages’ of small children, but once we grow up, how often are we tuned into them? We usually just default to ‘talking and listening’.

When we are in the ‘teacher’ or ‘trainer’ role, we usually do A LOT of talking. 
And of course, we (ideally) do a lot of listening as well.
But what does it mean to REALLY listen?

Last week, I delivered a twilight INSET to a BIG group – over 80 staff – around ‘The Playful Brain’.
It’s a ‘soft’ subject, maybe, but it’s underpinned by some heavy-duty theory (I love talking, but anyone who knows me knows I especially love talking about brains🧠!)

Every time I teach, I learn something new, and this time was no exception.
I always try to be an active listener, and much of what I learned in that session was from hearing the ‘unspoken voices’.

I learned how the size of a group impacts the way a group learns.
I noticed how many people found the rows of chairs restrictive, and how much they needed to move.
I realised how much narrower trainees’ bandwidth is when they’ve already done a full day’s work.

Their attention span may have been shorter than usual, but I was also aware that, when prompted to discuss the material, they became energised and completely immersed; they needed to unpack it, explore it, and make sense of it within their own role or context.

The question I’ve been reflecting on since, of course, is how counter-productive it is to force-feed children information – with no space for thinking, talking, processing, rehearsing (or moving!) – and how inaccurate it is to call that ‘learning’.
But that’s a different post…

The question I had to answer in that moment was ‘How do I respond to this, right now?

Because, whether we teach, train or facilitate, doing it well is about way more than knowing our stuff.
I had to chop mine down to make time for an unplanned break.
I had to rapidly magic up a practical activity so that ‘play’ was experienced and embodied, not just taught.
Otherwise, my session would have fallen short.

My training may not be the most meaningful example, but what I’m essentially talking about here is the phenomenon of ‘attunement‘.
Attunement has the potential to affect us deeply and emotionally; it has many lessons to share and I don’t think we should ever stop learning them.

But that can be challenging for a number of reasons, and here’s why…

Firstly, whether we work with children or adults, when our role is the position of ‘leader’, being led by their needs – and meeting them – can feel like an undermining of our own authority.
We still need to hold the space, otherwise things can easily fall apart.

Many professionals, especially those who are managed by rigid and inflexible systems, are also simply not granted the permission or freedom or trust to lead with attunement.
The work is person-centred in theory, but not in practice.

And, even so, attunement isn’t always easy to master; it takes awareness, sensitivity, adaptability, and a level of self-trust we’re rarely encouraged to feel.
And it can’t be rushed.
So it often feels safer to just stick with the familiar; to plough on with the system or the ‘script’ that we know by heart.

So here’s an invitation…

How much more impactful can we be in our practice, just by paying attention to the fine detail, by intentionally ‘reading the room‘?

How can we affect change, simply by recognising that what people need from us isn’t aligned with what we want from them, and respond to that?

The belief that our professional capacities are limited to skills or knowledge or cognition is false; the art of attunement is a deep well of intelligence in its own right.
It lives in the body – not just the brain – and uses the language of instinct and intuition, not just words.

What happens when we really intentionally pay attention, when we hear the silences and the pauses, not just the speech?
What can we learn when we observe the really subtle cues; the movement of the eyes, the shuffling, the slight shifts in energy?

This level of communication happens mostly beneath conscious awareness, so your people – your children, your team, your staff etc. – probably don’t know themselves what they have to say.
They may not notice what they’re telling you.

But, if you’re listening with attunement, you will… 

🤫

PS) This material (and more!) is explored in my CPD session ‘Heart Based Connection: Using Your Presence as well as Your Practice’.
Find out more about this and ‘The Playful Brain’ here.
.

Posted on Leave a comment

More Tests = ‘A Stronger Foundation For Learning’; Why It Couldn’t Be Further From The Truth

More Tests = 'A Stronger Foundation For Learning'; Why It Couldn't Be Further From The Truth

When my son was very small, he loved little more than books. He’d routinely bring me five at once so we could read them back to back.

Then the colour-coded levels of primary school determined his reading material more than what interested him, and books lost some of their sparkle.

Fast-forward to year 6… He was never motivated by dangling carrots, but once he could choose his own books again, he set out to achieve his ‘gold award’ for regular reading at home.
And he almost did.

But then SATS came. His teachers worked hard to not over-stress the children.
But there were still practice papers, booster classes, multiple homework tasks and months of relentless SATs talk.

Once they were over, my kid stopped reading. He quit working towards his ‘gold award’.

And he is one of the more fortunate children; a neurotypical child who does well, who achieved ‘greater depth’…
Who’s not only a competent reader, but is full of imagination, loves to create stories, goes to drama class and is also well-nurtured at home.

Yet in the almost six months that have passed since, I think he’s voluntarily picked up a book twice.
Testing killed off his love for them.

So what about the children who are not so blessed, not so lucky, not so supported, whose brains are well out of kilter with the learning environment?

Parents can be fined for not sending their children into this education system,  but many schools can – and do – choose to exclude increasing numbers of them, simply because they don’t fit the increasingly narrow window of who is deemed ‘acceptable’ in mainstream.

Secondaries in particular are designed for children who can comply with wildly unrealistic adult expectations – time management, organisation, planning, communication – competencies that many adults never master.

Yet there’s no accountability – or space in the curriculum – for teaching children these skills, who, even at 11 years old, may then be routinely punished for not having yet learned them.
Practices that are deemed in the adult world as coercive control, harassment or abuse are common practice; excused because ‘they are just children’.

Far too many children are already not in school or not coping with school because it’s on them to meet the cookie-cutter needs of the system, rather that the system to be designed around the diversity of their needs.

Do we really need to ask so many children can’t manage, why Alternative Provisions are overflowing?
Because children haven’t changed in the last 10 years anywhere near as much as schools have.
The children in Alternative Provision, waiting for them and in need of are telling us EVERYTHING that is failing them about the current system, but not being listened to.

The system has already created a rod for its own back.

And yet here we are… Another day, another short-sighted educational decision – with absolutely NO evidence behind it – to test children EVEN more; to make even more of them anxious, stressed and unable to cope with the demands of mainstream and diverted to expensive and over-subscribed APs.

What will MORE testing actually do to our kids, especially for those children who struggle with learning already?

❌ They’ll learn that learning is stressful and pointless.

❌ They’ll learn to see themselves as stupid or inadequate.

❌ They will learn to hate school.

And what will happen to the teachers who joined the profession to harness children’s innate love of learning… Whose schools are being turned into data factories where children come to be processed, not to meaningfully engage in learning?

This is NOT just about engagement, motivation, or children needing more ‘grit’.

They are born with 100 billion brain cells in their heads, capable of making millions of connections every second 🧠

☠️ But the biochemistry of stress is toxic; nothing will destroy neural connectivity faster.

☠️ There is nothing more harmful for brain development than chronic stress.

☠️ There is no greater myth than that you can stress a brain into learning.

If a policy was designed to disenchant teachers, deepen the divide between families and schools, and destroy children’s appetite for learning, I think this is it.

As professionals and as parents, we need to recognise that children are not the problem.
This reckless sabotage – of their love of learning and their mental health – is. 😔

When will the people who make decisions about how young brains learn, learn about how young brains learn?

Don’t forget to sign up below to get gold like this delivered straight to your inbox.

Posted on Leave a comment

The Window-Dressing of ‘High Expectations’: Why They Need To Be Challenged…

The Window-Dressing of 'High Expectations': Why They Need To Be Challenged...

It’s funny witnessing my own child’s transition into secondary school, and not in a funny ‘haha’ way.
I hear a daily commentary about the misdemeanours which warrant ‘C4’s and ‘C5’s.

Window-dressed for children as ‘high expectations’, what I hear about daily are UNREALISTIC expectations; demands placed on 11 and 12 year olds to possess skills of the adult world.

If we want children to develop these adult skills, why are we not teaching the skills?

I’m all behind ‘high expectations’ and ‘high standards’, but they still have to be congruent with what a developing brain is capable of.
Because what we know about brains is this:

🧠 These kids’ brains are still 15+ years away from maturity.

🧠 Learning (neurologically quite different from simply ‘remembering’) happens through repetition and practice, not punishment.

🧠 Sanctioning children isn’t teaching, it’s operant conditioning; Skinner’s lab rats in school uniforms. And it’s shaming.

🧠 Shame releases the most toxic biochemical composition in the brain, slowing or stopping dendrites in the brain from connecting; AKA learning.

If our policy-makers made policy with the brain in mind, we wouldn’t have so many children in detention or isolation all day because they’ve lost a PE sock (yes, this is a genuine consequence in my son’s academy trust).

❌ We wouldn’t have children set up to fail by unrealistic expectations window-dressed as ‘high expectations’.

❌ We wouldn’t have so many children disengaged from learning – despite having 100 billion brain cells in their heads – resenting teachers and counting down every miserable minute until home time.

❌ We wouldn’t have buzz words like ‘belonging’ and ‘inclusive’ being banded about on websites and prospectuses, when the reality of children’s experience is anything but.

Gems like this land straight in your inbox when you’re subscribed to my mailing list. Sign up below!

Posted on Leave a comment

Negotiating, Incentivising or Bribing? 🤔 What’s the difference, and why we need to know…

Are We Negotiating, Incentivising or Bribing? Why We Need To Know The Difference...

An unpleasant and difficult episode occurred between me and my 11 year old – who is still very much adapting to secondary school life – this week.
He was tired and not as his best, but it didn’t warrant missing school.
I usually admire his steely determination, but the clock was ticking, and I had little patience right then for his adamance that it did.

I absolutely detest situations like this; they so often bring out the worst in everyone.
After I’d almost lost my s***, I considered the easiest and quickest way to make him comply; in other words, what bribes I could resort to?

Sometimes, asserting our authority as the decision-maker is exactly the right act for our kids, but that can make us slip easily into bribe territory like this 👆.
The odd bribe is warranted – I accept that completely – but IMO, routinely relying on them can be counter-productive.

Here’s why:

  1. We may be the grown-up and they may be the child, but most bribes determine who’s going to get their way; who is going to win?
    Our kids become our opponents without us even realising.
    But relationships built on an ‘I’ll find a way to have the power or to control you’ dynamic aren’t healthy, for anyone.
    Don’t we want to be on our kid’s side, and them to be on ours?

  2. Negotiation is a useful skill for kids to learn, but it’s a fine line between them being able to compromise and them knowing how to pull the strings.
    When we find that we’re on the receiving end of their “I’ll only do X for you if you do Y for me” (or a version of), our resorting to bribery has backfired; we’ve just taught them how to bribe us right back.

  3. So our child is resisting a task; we offer a more attractive alternative, they conform, JD. Bribes can make for a quick win.
    And sometimes, the circumstance demands just that. 
    But not always…
    Because difficult feelings and situations will continue to challenge them as they grow up.
    So what supports our kids most in the long run; making everything easier and stress-free for them (and, let’s be honest, ourselves)?
    Or helping them to accept and tolerate discomfort, even if that means having to bear our own discomfort with them?

So here’s an invitation for you…
Next time you’re tempted to bribe or even ‘incentivise’ your kids, pause… And ask yourself:

  • Who is this bribe serving most; me or them?

  • What’s the price for avoiding the messiness of conflict or discomfort (yours or theirs)?

  • What do I need to prioritise in this moment; the quick win or the long game?
For regular insights like this to land straight in your inbox, make sure you’re signed up to my mailing list below. 
Posted on Leave a comment

Children Who ‘Need To Change’? What Usually Needs To Change First…

Children Who 'Need To Change'? What Usually Needs To Change First...

As a parent of the new Year 7 intake, I recently attended a parent event where the school’s ‘Consequence’ system was explained; non-compliant children spending the day in ‘reflection’ (AKA isolation, let’s be honest) was justified as ‘preparation for the adult world’.

I asked if it worked; do children actually learn the desired skills from their confinement?
The answer, if I’m being diplomatic, was that the approach is ‘inconclusive’.

I do appreciate that it would be much easier for schools – and children – if the curriculum included modules to teach the skills that children are then sanctioned for not possessing: planning and organisation, time-keeping, impulse-control, communication etc.

But equally, has anyone in history ever meaningfully learned a skill (because, neurologically, ‘fear of consequence’ is a far cry from ‘learning’) by being punished for not yet having done so?

Children are not the problem.

The problem is that the world – not just education systems – has lost touch with the fact that childhood is not merely an 18 year training programme of ‘readiness’; for school, for exams, for the workplace, future uncertainty and global crisis, and good forbid ‘adulthood’.

The problem is expecting young, immature and inexperienced humans to be equipped with adult skills, when by and large, they are simply doing the best they can in a world designed by grown-ups, for grown-ups.

Skills, by nature,
 are learned; unlike physical growth, they aren’t just a by-product of age.
And that’s deceptive because, while bodily change is a one-way, often rapid, trajectory, social and emotional change is not.
For that, children are at the mercy of very complex brain development – especially during the adolescent years – and that’s a different beast entirely.

Acquiring skills is primarily about fortune; whether you’re born into and raised in a conducive environment, or have a neurotype that can learn and apply them is mostly a matter of luck.

But poor sleep, dehydration, diet, stress, trauma and various other factors all compromise the capacity of any brain to execute the task at hand, at the required moment.
In our own moments of frustration or tiredness, how easily do we forget that we, as adults, have difficult days, or feel defeated, or just don’t always function at our most effective?

Unfortunately, the reality 
is that many practitioners, educators in particular, are essentially tasked with fast-tracking childhood in ways that Mother Nature does not accommodate for.
Because ‘growing up’ is designed to be a painfully slow process; the brain is still maturing until it’s around 30 years old.

But all is not lost. There are simple ways we can work with, not against, children’s development, and their innate desire to connect the 100 billion neurons that their developing brains are born with:

Always meet brains where they are whenever you can. Because whatever the intention or rationale, you can’t force a square peg into a round hole; unready and poorly equipped brains just don’t achieve ‘readiness’ that way.
If anything, any ‘I can’t’ beliefs that these children already have just become more cemented in. Nobody wins.

Focus on mastery, nor memory. Knowing ‘what to do’ can be very far removed from genuinely practicing the doing.
The brain’s primary memory bank is not even in the area of the brain that learns.
AKA the neo-cortex, this part of the brain needs routine, rhythm and rehearsal, on repeat.
And not just for a day, or a week; neuronal pathways don’t have a ‘finish line’. But they do love the ‘four R’s’.

Conducive vs Contradictory conditions? If the ‘consequences’ aren’t leading to the desired change, the chances are that even more of what’s not working won’t either.
If the aim, for example, is for an uncontrolled child to learn better self-control, sanctions which render them powerless are only helping them fail.
When we change our approach, so the ‘consequences’ help them to apply, practice and master self-control, then the child can change. That’s when ‘consequences’ work. Everyone wins ☺️

PS) If your team need to know more about young brain development, details on The Developing Brain, The Adolescent Brain and The Vulnerable Brain CPD is here.

Posted on Leave a comment

Being Needed ‘Differently’, Not Less… What It Means To ‘Grow Up’

Being Needed 'Differently', Not Less: What It Means When Our Kids 'Grow Up'

I always anticipate the long days and sunshine of summer but – like many of us whose professional and/or personal lives are governed by school terms -I usually find myself wilting by June.
A little part of me wishes life away in what feels like a limp to the finish line, while a bigger part of me has the simultaneous urge to slow down the relentless march of time.

That feeling not could not have been truer for me this week, as I saw my only child off to his secondary school transition day.
Instead of honking the horn or even giving a little wave, knowing it would likely embarrass him, I blanked him as I drove away, trying not to look as bereft as I felt.

Childhood is such a short window, and yet we expend so much energy willing the time to pass.
From day one, as parents, we’re waiting for our baby’s first smile, then to to walk and talk, and to please, please, please just sleep through the night.
Every little increment towards independence is applauded and celebrated.

And conversely, the lack of progress – the umpteenth time we’ve asked them to tidy up, to take responsibility for their stuff, to clean their teeth without being asked – can be beyond frustrating.

So when we finally see signs of long-awaited change – organising their belongings, planning ahead, getting their own drink without lengthy negotiations – every step can feel like a reward for all the sacrifices we’ve made to raise them.
And that’s always time well spent.

But we also live in a world that seems to be forgetting that children are allowed to be young, that being young is good for them; that childhood is neither a race, nor an 18 year training programme of ‘readiness’; for school, for exams, for the world of work or, god forbid, for ‘adulthood’.

What do you want to do when you grow up?

So much attention is channelled into what they will become, instead of who they are, right now.
And that doesn’t just steal their childhood, it steals our parenthood.

IMO, we rarely acknowledge the emotional upheaval of continually being outgrown, bit by bit.
How often do we sit with that; what it feels like to bid farewell to the pieces of childhood we know will never return?

I’m not suggesting we infantilise our children, stringing out childhood for all we can, or that we suppress their very natural urges to mature.
But nor do kids need to be ushered through their youth in such a hurry.

Their changing bodies only tell a small part of that journey. And it’s deceptive.
Because, while physical transformation is a one-way – and often rapid – trajectory, social and emotional growth it not.
For that, children are at the mercy of very complex brain development, and it’s a different beast entirely; one that can’t be fast-tracked, whatever the mis-claimed merits of ‘kicking them out of the nest‘ or ‘chucking them in at the deep end‘.

Yes, some of them may need more guidance and support than others, but when we adjust our expectations of what it means for them to ‘grow up’, it is possible – and perhaps necessary – to hold onto our children, while we also let them go:

Babying them vs Nurturing them
I fully acknowledge that children need to be exposed to challenges to learn how to overcome them, and so it is always a balancing act.
But the prevailing belief – that ‘mollycoddling’ them will make them helpless and dependent, forever refusing to stand on their own two feet – is nonsense.

It is normal for a child, or even adolescent, to want to be cuddled sometimes, or to fall sleep next to you, to cry over the seemingly insignificant, or insist they can’t when we know (and they know) that they can.

If these behaviours become pervasive and problematic, they may need a different kind of attention, but by and large, this is how young humans who don’t yet have the skills of the adult world often express their needs, albeit not in the most articulate of ways.
They’re not asking us to decide whether their need is valid or not.
And yes, we want them to learn how to meet their own needs, of course. And they will.

But by helping them, or cuddling them, or letting them cry etc., far from ‘making a rod for your own back’ or ‘babying them’, you are simply meeting their needs.
Let’s always be the person they can trust to do that for them, until they can – or choose to – do it for themselves.
Because they are all wired to grow up, but in their own time, not necessarily in ours.

Progression vs Regression
Once a child has demonstrated a particular skill or competence, it seems logical we should expect them to maintain it, perhaps even develop it further. Not necessarily.

Stress, sleep, hydration, diet – not to mention the turbulence of brain development and biochemistry 🧠 – are all determining factors in the practice and mastery of any kind of learned skill.

And because all of these can vary enormously from – day to day, even hour to hour – it means that what our kids (and ourselves) are capable of in any given moment can vary enormously as well.

In our own moments of frustration or tiredness, how easily do we forget that, as adults, we have bad days, or feel defeated, or just don’t always function at our most effective?

So if your child returns to ‘can’t, don’t or won’t’, it doesn’t mean they’ve stalled, regressed or must be faking helplessness (although they might be).
But mastery takes time, and often much more than time.
We may just need to muster up reserves of patience we didn’t even know we had in the meantime.

They don’t need you anymore vs They still need you
As children get older, they can easily give us the impression that they ‘don’t need us anymore’ (apart from our financial and taxi services, perhaps).
And of course, there’s truth in that in many respects. Especially as they progress towards adolescence, we may not just find ourselves unneeded, but unwanted.

In the face of their apathy, when they reject the support or connection we try to offer, when they fail to appreciate or reciprocate the love and kindness we want them to feel, it’s hard to believe that they need us at all, but the chances are, they do – even if they don’t know it themselves, much less, be able to articulate it.

But it’s a well-documented truth that a relationship with at least one mature adult is a hugely protective factor in our kids’ emotional health, especially as they navigate stressors or challenging changes, even more so during the often chaotic and volatile teenage years.

Growing up takes a long time. Brains are still maturing at 25+ years 🧠, long after our ‘child’ is no longer a child.
So instead of just thinking that your child no longer needs you, think differently.

It’s less about them not needing us, or needing us less, and more about them needing us ‘differently’.
Differently, not less. 

Want insights like this 👆 delivered directly to your inbox? Sign up below 👇